Crossbow questions

N3OGIN

New Member
So I am new to writing and I have started my book where the main character uses a crossbow as their main weapon. Does anyone know anything about crossbows or anyhing I can use as a guide in order to write? I have searched for a few things but I cant seem to find anything that helps me. For some more information my character is using a wooden recurve crossbow.
Thanks for whoever helps
Ps. I hope this is in the right place I made an account just to ask this question.
 
Medieval covers a timespan of centuries. You'll need to be more specific than that.

It also depends on the size and type of the crossbow. Is it cocked using physical strength, or by using a windlass, crank or cranequin? How are you envisaging your character using it? On foot, I assume?
 
Another question is, why a crossbow? A recurve should be faster and easier to fire. I have a compound bow myself. Also, what is this character's sex? Because men use heavier draw weights than women.
 
I kind of see my character using it on foot and on horse, a shire horse specifically, he loads it using physical strength and it can hold only one arrow at a time. For specifics like the size and type of crossbow im not completely sure, though its more on the bigger size
 
Another question is, why a crossbow? A recurve should be faster and easier to fire. I have a compound bow myself. Also, what is this character's sex? Because men use heavier draw weights than women.
I chose a crossbow due to how he will need to use it later in the book. And when he is running a loaded weapon is easier to pull out than to throw one of his daggers. I also know that crossbows are more powerful than a bow and that he will definitely need a long distance weapon. The reason I chose a recurve crossbow is because they are less detailed and most of the other types I saw were not wooden ones.
 
I kind of see my character using it on foot and on horse, a shire horse specifically, he loads it using physical strength and it can hold only one arrow at a time. For specifics like the size and type of crossbow im not completely sure, though its more on the bigger size

A large crossbow would generally require two hands to aim properly with. Typically, crossbows would be loaded by putting your foot on it, then pulling the string back up towards you. Smaller Renaissance crossbows with certain mechanisms could be loaded and fired on horseback, but a larger crossbow is a one-shot weapon.

Crossbow ammunition is commonly called a bolt or quarrel, not an arrow.

 
A large crossbow would generally require two hands to aim properly with. Typically, crossbows would be loaded by putting your foot on it, then pulling the string back up towards you. Smaller Renaissance crossbows with certain mechanisms could be loaded and fired on horseback, but a larger crossbow is a one-shot weapon.

Crossbow ammunition is commonly called a bolt or quarrel, not an arrow.

Thank you so much for that! Right now I am writing a scene where he uses his crossbow to hit a target, I used the word “arrow” a few times but I have chaged those to the correct term.
 
A large crossbow would generally require two hands to aim properly with. Typically, crossbows would be loaded by putting your foot on it, then pulling the string back up towards you. Smaller Renaissance crossbows with certain mechanisms could be loaded and fired on horseback, but a larger crossbow is a one-shot weapon.

Crossbow ammunition is commonly called a bolt or quarrel, not an arrow.

A regular bow is likely to be faster to use and might have more range. Don’t remember. But I feel range and speed are important.
 
A regular bow is likely to be faster to use and might have more range. Don’t remember. But I feel range and speed are important.
Alright ill keep that in mind for when he needs to use a weapon in dire situations. Thank you for informing me!
 
A regular bow is likely to be faster to use and might have more range. Don’t remember. But I feel range and speed are important.

Correct, but a bow needed skill to use. Crossbows were largely point and click.
 
A regular bow is likely to be faster to use and might have more range. Don’t remember. But I feel range and speed are important.
Crossbows had longer distance but were very slow to load . One of the reasons for various English victories over the French was that the French would get one volley off them while they were reloading the archers would close the range and shoot several points

On point a crossbow would be very difficult to reload on horseback since it was usual to use one foot to hold it down while the string was drawn back
 
On point a crossbow would be very difficult to reload on horseback since it was usual to use one foot to hold it down while the string was drawn back
FWIW, the cranequin changed this, so there was a period between its invention and the widespread adoption of firearms where mounted crossbowmen were an actual thing on the battlefield.

Of course, rate of fire remains an issue. OP, you’re probably looking at 1-3 shots a minute, depending on skill and draw weight.
 
***WARNING: VERY LONG, but then again, I'm trying to summarize hundreds of years and many different weapons!*** ;)

Gosh. The amount of things we haven't touched on yet... For a start:

I chose a crossbow due to how he will need to use it later in the book. And when he is running a loaded weapon is easier to pull out than to throw one of his daggers.

All right, but what weapon does he use for hand-to-hand fighting? Sooner or later he'll have to do it.

A regular bow is likely to be faster to use and might have more range. Don’t remember. But I feel range and speed are important.

What do you mean by "a regular bow"? I understand that we're in the medieval era, but the kind of bows that were used in 1000 AD (or even 1066 AD) are very different to the ones used in Crécy, Poitiers, and Agincourt/Azincourt. Magyar bows were different to the Welsh longbows, etc.

Come to think of that, the crossbows used during the Crusades (1095 to 1291) were different to the ones used by the Genoese crossbowmen at Crécy.

But if we were to simplify this: N3OGIN, you said your character uses a wooden crossbow. The early wooden crossbows were made of wood and sinew, which made them vulnerable to rain. If it rained, the sinew became slack, which made the crossbow useless (which is what happened to the Genoese crossbowmen at Crécy).

In the 12th century, crossbows began to be made from a composite of wood and iron (i.e. composite crossbow). This changed to an steel lath crossbow (also sometimes referred to as arbalest) in the 15th century.

Also, the rate of fire of a medieval crossbow was about 3 bolts in one minute. In contrast, the Welsh longbowmen could fire at a fearsome rate of 6 arrows a minute. The Welsh arrowheads could easily penetrate mail (generally known as chain-mail) and even the later plate armour.

Lastly, the effective range of a medieval crossbow is generally calculated at about 100 yards. A longbow, however, can shoot much further - 450 to 1,000 feet.

So why didn't everyone use the longbow? Because it was so tall (some were as tall as 6 feet!) that it took years and years of practice to be any good at it. Longbowmen started training at the age of 6 (with smaller bows, obviously) and continued training all their lives. If you weren't used to it, your aim could wobble, resulting in inaccurate shooting. (I tried shooting one, but I'm a beginner, so my aim was wobbly until I got used to it). In contrast, medieval crossbows were much easier to use. They were steadier and required less time to train.

Conclusion. Longbows had a longer effective range and higher rate of fire; crossbows took less time to train and were easier to aim. They were also useless in wet weather. (A longbowman could unstring his bow and keep the bowstring dry; a crossbowman couldn't do the same trick).

One last point: N3OGIN, you mentioned your character using a crossbow on a horse. This was not possible with a purely wood-and-sinew crossbow.

Mounted crossbowmen did exist but they were not used in the same way as mounted archers (e.g. Huns, Magyars, Mongols etc.) Mounted archers would ride up to within range of the enemy and then loose arrows while still in the saddle. They would then gallop away before the enemy could react.

Mounted crossbowmen could ride up close to the enemy and discharge one shot, but then their crossbows would be useless. Why? Because it's impossible to reload a crossbow while mounted on a horse. It's also difficult to accurately aim a crossbow while in the saddle of a large, powerful animal. So they'd have to ride very close and shoot point-blank, which naturally put them in far more danger. They'd have to have some kind of hand-to-hand weapon (swords/maces/etc.) to defend themselves, and since they couldn't carry large shields, they'd naturally be at a disadvantage against heavy cavalry.

Your character might be able to discharge and reload his crossbow from the saddle IF he was under cover or protected somehow (e.g. in a siege situation). But your description sounds very different to a siege.

Anyway, I've lectured enough. I hope you find this useful. :)
 
Rath is right on the money about longbows and how they were used. One point that should be added is that at the 450' range, they weren't horribly accurate, but they didn't need to be. The archers shot in volleys at large numbers of the enemy, and if the arrows didn't kill the man you aimed at, it would probably kill the guy beside him or behind him.

I've seen good arches loose up to twelve shafts a minute, with considerable accuracy at close range (like forty yards). Scary.

One more thing: there was a rather bad movie set in medieval England where the bad guys used miniature hand-held crossbows. (I can't remember the name, and don't really want to.) It was as if the original script called for revolvers, and when it was pointed out that they didn't have revolvers at that period, the script-writers went back and crossed out "guns" and wrote "crossbows." Easy fix.
 
One more thing: there was a rather bad movie set in medieval England where the bad guys used miniature hand-held crossbows. (I can't remember the name, and don't really want to.) It was as if the original script called for revolvers, and when it was pointed out that they didn't have revolvers at that period, the script-writers went back and crossed out "guns" and wrote "crossbows." Easy fix.

Ack!! :eek: The script-writers obviously have no idea about weapons. Revolvers, obviously, work in a completely different way to crossbows.

To anyone familiar with firearms, I'm sorry if I'm about to "mansplain", but it bears repeating. :) Please feel free to correct me if I get something wrong.

The name "revolver" comes from the revolving cylinder, which spins to bring the next round into alignment with the barrel for firing. This rotating cylinder distinguishes it from pistols, which typically have a fixed chamber. :) (I'm sure you've all seen cowboy films where this happens). ;)

One of the best-known revolvers was the Colt Action Single Army, also known as the "Peacemaker". It's particularly famous for its historical significance and iconic status in the American West. Other notable and well-known revolvers include the Webley Revolver, the Smith & Wesson Model 10, the Ruger New Model Blackhawk, and the Smith & Wesson Model 29 (known for its use in "Dirty Harry").

As for guns ... *sigh* ... the main difference between a revolver and a handgun (when referring to a handgun) is in how they load and fire ammunition. Revolvers use a rotating cylinder to hold multiple cartridges, while guns (usually pistols) use a detachable magazine. Revolvers typically hold 6 shots, while pistols can hold more.

Comparing either of them to crossbows is ludicrous. The only possible similarity is that both crossbows and early smoothbore firearms (e.g. arquebuses, blunderbusses, muskets) could only hold a single piece of ammunition - one bolt or one ball (early bullet), respectively. The early rifles could only have one, too.

Again, I apologise to anyone who already knows this. But if you don't, I hope you enjoyed my rant. :)
 
You should check out a YouTube channel called Todd's Workshop. It's pretty much all crossbows and longbows and how everything works. Some longbow expert named Joe shows up a lot, and he's pretty accurate.

For gunz, Hickock45 is the man.
 
I'm in no way an expert in any of this, but I cannot fathom how your character is going to be mounted on a horse and shooting a crossbow.

I really think one of these things needs to change - either YC is on foot or a platform of some kind like in a chariot being pulled by a horse OR YC isn't using a crossbow.

HOWEVER......what type of mount are we discussing? Is this a regular horse? A pegasus? A griffin? A centaur? ETC. If that's the case, MAYBE the mount can help in some way?

(YC = "your character")
 
Back
Top