When it came to the Battle of Hastings (1066), 3% said that it was won by Robin Hood ... and 2% said it was won by Napoleon.![]()
Oh, good heavens. Even in America we know Hercule Poirot won every battle ever fought with Hastings.
When it came to the Battle of Hastings (1066), 3% said that it was won by Robin Hood ... and 2% said it was won by Napoleon.![]()
When it came to the Battle of Hastings (1066)
See, this is what comes of poor teaching. Much better would be the technique of "filking" songs like this:Today I learned that, at least according to the Daily Mail (link here if anyone's interested), a survey of 1,000 English people was held to ask them relatively simple questions about history.
When it came to the Battle of Hastings (1066), 3% said that it was won by Robin Hood ... and 2% said it was won by Napoleon.![]()
There is, of course, a third explanation: they're just pulling the surveyor's leg. (Who knows why).![]()
Always a danger, particularly when the surveyor is interviewing knowledgeable people. In the same vein, Penn Jillette (the famous magician) took a survey about how many people were acquainted with the dangers of a chemical called "di-hydrogen monoxide" which caused millions of deaths every year and were a huge component of a jet's contrails. Most people were aghast at learning about such a threat to their well-being, but college students with a background in chemistry got the joke. "Di-hydrogen monoxide" is, of course, water.
People are indescribably stupid. They've yet to invent a unit of measure to properly quantify it.
1/1000th of a Helen? Haha. I have over a thousand UofMs in my purchasing database, but that's a new one.A most useful unit of measure I've found is the "Milli-Helen"... the amount of beauty required to launch one ship.
While I knew that the year 1066 was significant to the Norman Conquest of Britain, I did not know the name of the battle.
The survey seems to be British-centric, and I wonder how well the British would do on a survey about Canadian history.
Damn, guess people are the same no matter the era. Apparently, a bunch of people got drunk on the White Ship, hoisted the main sail when still in the harbor and sends the ship speeding straight into a bunch of rocks, killing the heir to the English throne and dozens of nobles.
Some friends of mine went, too. Henrik of Havn (I don't know his modern name offhand) was one of those participants. When his costume was submitted for vetting, one of the judges said, "I'm sorry, but we can't allow that tunic. Machine trim, you see."Some friends were devoted SCA people. One year, they went to England to attend a reenactment of Hastings. Requirements for costume, etc. were stringent. George couldn't wear his glasses and didn't have contacts, so his view of things was a tad fuzzy. No modern synthetic fabrics, no make up, no modern hair styles, long list of other specifics. They had a wonderful time.
Was use of the Silver Ribbon of St Tenacious allowed? Holy relic and all, what what.Some friends were devoted SCA people. One year, they went to England to attend a reenactment of Hastings. Requirements for costume, etc. were stringent. George couldn't wear his glasses and didn't have contacts, so his view of things was a tad fuzzy. No modern synthetic fabrics, no make up, no modern hair styles, long list of other specifics. They had a wonderful time.
Alas, I'm missing the joke.Silver Ribbon of St Tenacious