Thank you, Catriona. (Yes, I read the whole article). I knew the story vaguely before, but this article told me much more. Thanks! 
Three loud cheers!Today I learned about Jan Žižka, a famous knight and military leader in Bohemia (now Czech Republic). He was a follower of Jan Hus (an early reformer of the Catholic Church), and a prominent Hussite who led the Taborite faction during the Hussite Wars (1419-1434). Renowned for his exceptional military skill, Žižka led the Hussite forces in battles against three crusades - defending Bohemia from the Papacy, the Kingdom of Hungary, and the Holy Roman Empire - and remained undefeated. He is now celebrated as a Czech national hero.
What makes him especially remarkable is the fact that he was half-blind (Žižka means “one-eyed”, a nickname derived from his early loss of an eye). He lost his first eye during his youth, with the exact cause unknown but possibly a childhood injury or a fight. He later lost his remaining eye in June 1421, when an arrow struck him during a battle near Bor. Even when blind, he continued to lead the Taborite soldiers to victory.
He died from the plague in October 1424, shortly after his last military victory at the Battle of Nová Paka. It was by no means the end of the fighting in central and eastern Europe, as the Hussite ideas led to more wars. Only the religious peace of Kutná Hora (1485) put a definite end to the Hussite Wars. Nevertheless, the Hussite ideas eventually led to John Calvin, Martin Luther, and the Protestant Reformation.
Oh, I dunno. That's a much more productive response to being dumped than stalking your ex or posting their old nudes on social media. People these days should emulate it.Yeah. Most folks just sob into a beer. This mad lad decided to go amputate legs in a foreign war.
Victorians. They never did anything half-measured, or sane.
Three loud cheers!
I've got ancestors from the Kutná Hora district of Czechia. They were all loyal Roman Catholics, but with all due honor and deference to them, I'm with the Hussites all the way.
Just for fun, I looked up the pronunciation of Žižka in my jolly little Czech-English dictionary. It's Zhizhka. That should help those who, like me, hear words in their heads as they read them.
Have you ever heard of William Marshal (or William the Marshall), the Earl of Pembroke from the 1200s in England and Wales? He was quite the mensch as well. For awhile, going by what a distant cousin of mine posted on his genealogical site, I believed that William was my 25th great-grandfather. But the cousin got two men of the same name in 18th century Tidewater Virginia mixed up and I had to relinquish my connection to The Most Perfect Knight.
Never mind. His life and career make wonderful and inspiring reading.
Hmm. Would the Encyclopedia Britannica be a better online source, then?
His correspondence is dotted with Austen references in a way that conveys a genuine fluency with her work. ‘Lydiaish’ means flirtatious, ‘like Mrs Bates’ is code for overly doting, ‘like Lady Cath. de Burgh’ stands in for stern, and ‘a Captain Wentworth’ was his cousin’s term of endearment for Captain FitzRoy. His private notebooks likewise reference numerous Austen characters, and three of Austen’s novels figure on his 1838-1840 reading list.
A keyword search yields that she uses some variant of the word ‘natural’ more than 500 times in her six novels. In Northanger Abbey (1817), Catherine reaps the blessings of ‘natural folly in a beautiful girl’ and is possessed by ‘feelings rather natural than heroic’. In Pride and Prejudice (1813), there is Lydia’s ‘high animal spirits’ and ‘natural self-consequence’, and in Sense and Sensibility (1811), Edward’s ‘natural shyness’ obscures his (‘by no means deficient’) ‘natural taste’. In Mansfield Park (1814), we see ‘natural claims’ and ‘natural powers’, and in Emma (1816), Harriet’s ‘natural graces’ run up against artificial class boundaries. In Austen’s final novel, and perhaps Darwin’s favourite, Persuasion (1818), Anne reasons with herself, insisting ‘how natural’ is the ‘oblivion of the past’ as she attempts to forget Frederick and his ‘natural sensation of curiosity’.
If it had been about connections in senses and senibilities, then that would have been something.Today I learned about the connections in sensibilities between Jane Austen and Charles Darwin
Perhaps it depends upon one's definition of beauty.
Not to suggest there's any obvious or simple answer, the first thing that occurs is demonstration of vitality, good genes.What is the utility of the peacock's feathers?
Not to suggest there's any obvious or simple answer, the first thing that occurs is demonstration of vitality, good genes.
I'd have thought it kinda does. It maybe doesn't explain why some species demonstrate their breeding potential through beauty pageantry over tests of strength or other forms of selection, but some species aren't equipped to safely butt heads like stags or trial by combat like lions. The peacocks and peahens long ago agreed that their species would quickly become extinct if they went on with that macho head-butting nonsnese given their delicate little hollow bones.But, you know, that still doesn't explain why the peahen so liked the extravagant feathers...
What is the utility of the peacock's feathers?
Not to suggest there's any obvious or simple answer, the first thing that occurs is demonstration of vitality, good genes.
But, you know, that still doesn't explain why the peahen so liked the extravagant feathers...
Not everything has to have a reason.
A woman with a husky voice? Yes, please.