Does what come up? Accusations and questions? Idk, tbh. But considering how many accusations are thrown around in my chosen genre and that, when on my game, I can write 120k in 28-34 days I thought it was better to insulate myself from the beginning than to attempt to reverse engineer it and prove it. I mean honestly, if they want proof I'll write on time lapse video, I have no issue with that. It's just... if it were to come up I don't want to have to say "trust me, bro."
Basically, yes, whether authorship gets challenged and proved through grammarly. I'm asking because I've never heard about that; not that I would have. But that leads me to a larger question: if agents or publishers see a manuscript that is worthy or monetary renumeration, would they even care? That's kind of the potential AI endgame as far as creative writing goes.
Idk. Perhaps not, but in my chosen genre, the READERS care and they will chuck an author out the window, drive over them in the street, and beat them for good measure. It's ugly out there and, at least in my genre, agents and publishers know that.
How could they prove it? Practically every word and sentence in the English language has been rehashed billions of times. I know you can copy/paste a sentence and the internet will show you where it came from i.e. a quote from a book etc.
The readers? That's just it, they can't (usually, but there have been cases of authors leaving prompts in), and they don't have to. It's the *belief* and the *accusation* that destroys if there's no tangible way to combat it.
Including music, television, sculpture, cinema... you name it. Nowadays, things like the Knives Out franchise stand out from the crowd because they aren't intended to please "everybody." And the majority of the Beatles's most respected oeuvre was the result of them ignoring what people wanted them to produce, and doing what their muses told them to do.
That's something that has been foretold for years. Investment people think it really started when computers began calling the shots for what to buy and what to sell, taking humans largely out of the evaluation process. There have been some limits since then on the process, but it's entirely reasonable that things can get out of hand faster than people can recognize the problem, let alone prevent it.
If you're referencing buy/sell systems for stock trades, sure. This is referencing AI as a product, and as a disruptive technology. Since the mid-90s at least, watching where the investments go and the financial health of companies was a factor in what technologies to implement and which companies would be alive 5 years down the line to support and upgrade your implementation.
