word is booster 18 blew up during gas pressure testing... some say the liquid oxygen tank ruptured
This news from a writers group friend made me very unhappy, but not the least bit surprised. Thieves and looters are everywhere.
If you or anyone on your publishing team uses Gmail, you need to hear this.
Yesterday, Google quietly flipped the switch on Gmail's "smart features"—automatically opting millions of users into allowing their private emails and attachments (including Word docs) to feed Gemini AI training models.
Yes, even unpublished manuscripts.
Even drafts you never sent.
This could affect you even if you don't personally use Gmail. If your agent, editor, beta readers, or anyone else on your team uses Gmail, Gemini has likely ingested your work.
I checked all nine of my gmail accounts and smart features theftware was switched on in all but one account, which I'll check again tomorrow. I turned them all off and will check the status regularly. I'll also mention this to others with whom I correspond regularly.
To get rid of it (at least for today)
Go to Settings in Gmail.
Click "see all settings."
Go to Google Workspace smart features.
Uncheck box to turn off smart features.

Gmail does scan email content to power its own “smart features,” such as spam filtering, categorisation, and writing suggestions. But this is part of how Gmail normally works and isn’t the same as training Google’s generative AI models. Google also maintains that these feature settings are opt-in rather than opt-out, although users’ experiences seem to vary depending on when and how the new wording appeared.
It’s easy to see where the confusion came from. Google’s updated language around “smart features” is vague, and the term “smart” often implies AI—especially at a time when Gemini is being integrated into other parts of Google’s products. When the new wording started appearing for some users without much explanation, many assumed it signalled a broader shift.
...
Google has updated some Gmail settings around how its “smart features” work, which control how Gmail analyses your messages to power built-in functions.
According to reports we’ve seen, Google has started automatically opting users in to allow Gmail to access all private messages and attachments for its smart features. This means your emails are analyzed to improve your experience with Chat, Meet, Drive, Email and Calendar products. However, some users are now reporting that these settings are switched on by default instead of asking for explicit opt-in—although Google’s help page states that users are opted-out for default.
Google also maintains that these feature settings are opt-in rather than opt-out
Time to break out the tinfoil hats.Thanks for the extra research and the article. Seems there has indeed been some confusion.
That being said:
I never opted into those feature settings. Google opted me in without consent on nine different accounts, so it wasn't a fluke. I had to opt out of those feature settings on all nine accounts. Ergo: Google lied. You're right. It was an easy to prove lie. What else are they lying about?
Why would Google automatically opt in users for features that allow Google access to email and attachment content if there was not some advantage to Google in doing so?
Thank the godsI bought a working typewriter. Lol.pretty soon its going to be unavoidable, if you put your books on amazon, they'll be used to train Jarvis, if you write in microsoft applications Co pilot will have access and so on...
Time to break out the tinfoil hats.
I have a typewriter but it isn't anywhere near as convenient as a word processor.Thank the godsI bought a working typewriter. Lol.
100%.Time to break out the tinfoil hats.
I swear, I feel like they’re trying to create an actual AI robot that’s indistinguishable from a human.
...Don't we have literally thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of sci-fi stories about sentient AI bots ranging from them becoming murderbots to 'do robots deserve equal rights like humans?'That is undoubtedly their end goal. They know they can't achieve it, but they will try to get as close to it as possible. Their current aim is AGI and ASI.
But nobody actually has any solid basis for how we might create these technologies. No, LLMs aren't it. Their constant hallucinations won't bring us to those technologies either.
The current AI situation is honestly insane. And even Google's CEO has admitted that it has elements of irrationality to it.
...Don't we have literally thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of sci-fi stories about sentient AI bots ranging from them becoming murderbots to 'do robots deserve equal rights like humans?'
My process seems to be pretty tailored at erase sentence > type a new variant > repeat until it feels and looks right. I can't do that with a typewriter. At least, not as fast. I'm curious if you find it as nice as a computer?
However, free and open source tools that don't steal your data do exist. I have Gentoo + Libreoffice. Nobody is going to steal my stories to train their AI's there.