Movies, Movies, Movies!

Question: If James Bond and Jason Bourne had a fight, who would win?* This is the same argument we had as kids when we were debating about whether Batman and the Phantom would win in a fight.. Later generations, of course, would argue about who would win... Data from Star Trek or the Terminator.

*Answer: If the James Bond was the Roger Moore, Pierce Brosnan, or Timothy Dalton version, then Jason Bourne would win. If Bond was the Daniel Craig or Sean Connery version, I'd put my money on them instead.

If James Bond was played by Sir Christopher Lee (don't laugh - I'm just conjecturing), then I'd put my money on him. Sir Christopher fought for the RAF in WW2, and was attached to elite units like the Special Air Service (SAS) and the Special Operations Executive (SOE) at various times. He used his language skills for missions and was involved in intelligence gathering and tracking down Nazi war criminals.

To use Hollywood parlance, Christopher Lee was "proper badass".

Then again, Sean Connery was no slouch either. He didn't fight in WW2, but he served as a naval gunner for three years and used that experience in the Bond films.
 
If James Bond was played by Sir Christopher Lee (don't laugh - I'm just conjecturing), then I'd put my money on him. Sir Christopher fought for the RAF in WW2, and was attached to elite units like the Special Air Service (SAS) and the Special Operations Executive (SOE) at various times. He used his language skills for missions and was involved in intelligence gathering and tracking down Nazi war criminals.

I agree. Lee's service with the SOE put him in touch with Ian Fleming, who also worked in British intelligence. He may have been one of the inspirations for James Bond.

Peter Jackson talks about a conversation he had with Lee when they were filming Saruman's demise scene. When Sir Peter told Sir Christopher that he didn't think that the Saruman's groan didn't seem realistic, the actor replied that he knew exactly what sort of sound a man would make when he was stabbed in the back.

There's a very interesting book on the SOE called Between Silk and Cyanide by Leo Marks. Marks's area was cryptography and he was in charge of training agents in code work. The title of the book comes from an argument he had with the people who were supplying the silk used in printing maps. When the suppliers complained that there wasn't enough silk to allocate for that purpose (most of it going to parachutes), Marks replied that if he couldn't get silk, the only alternative was to provide the agents with cyanide capsules, because paper maps would have been found too easily.
 
I've been on a strange 90s rewatch the past couple months, involving B movie creature features and disaster movies I saw as a kid. It's been plenty of mindless fun.

We're talking like, Congo, Anaconda, Lake Placid, Volcano. The best was probably The Edge, which was by far the longest. There's nothing quite like a tight 90-minute flick with action and silly quips that doesn't make you think at all. Pure escapism.
 
I've been on a strange 90s rewatch the past couple months, involving B movie creature features and disaster movies I saw as a kid. It's been plenty of mindless fun.

We're talking like, Congo, Anaconda, Lake Placid, Volcano. The best was probably The Edge, which was by far the longest. There's nothing quite like a tight 90-minute flick with action and silly quips that doesn't make you think at all. Pure escapism.
Aw come on - the best is Lake Placid. Betty White was iconic lol

Edit: although I have to admit I don't think I ever saw Volcano or The Edge.
 
Last edited:
Been watching more flicks lately with the extra spare time. One of the new ones was One Battle After Another. It's been hyped up so much for me by acquaintances over the past several months that I was pretty much doomed to be disappointed. And yeah, I do think it's massively overrated, but I still give it 4/5 stars. Maybe I'll watch it again next year and I'll feel differently one way or the other.

Another new movie was Weapons. Loved it. Creepy, great performances, 5/5. Sinners was also extremely solid; I'd say a 4.5/5.

And finally, over the past couple weeks I've been rewatching the old Star Trek movies for the billionth time. Wrath of Khan is obviously still the best, though I really enjoyed Voyage Home and Undiscovered Country. I didn't remember The Final Frontier being so bad the last time I saw it, but damn, it stinks!

Not quite sure what I'll check out next, but I've got a bunch of things in my queue as we all do.
 
I haven't watched a movie in several months now. Thinking about watching Project Hail Mary when it arrives on my digital store of choice. Either that or Avatar Fire and Ash.

I see that Project Hail Mary has good reviews, so I'm a bit excited. I've also been eyeing Mikey 17.
 
Project Hail Mary
I saw that with my Dad and two of my uncles in the theater when it came out. First time in years I went to an actual theater. They have beer and heated recliners bigger than my chair at home. Maybe 50 seats in the theater total, as opposed to the two hundred plastic folding chairs back in the day. But, hey, you need to give me a reason to leave the comfort of my home.

It was a good movie. B/B+. The usual preposterous sci-fi things but I give the filmmakers a lot of credit for not bothering to justify any of it. Don't draw attention to plot holes by inviting scrutiny through explanation. And I'm a Ryan Gosling fan, but I didn't think he was a great fit. Similar to Matt Damon in The Martian, I have a hard time accepting deep emotions and the real threat of danger from the frat-boy class of actors. It's like even they know nothing bad can happen to the likes of them.

I didn't read the book so I wasn't disappointed like my dad was.
 
I just watched 2010: The Year We Made Contact, a Ridley Scott production from 1984. It suffered the inevitable comparisons with Kubrick's 2001 and, I confess, it didn't have the breathtaking impact that the latter's special effects had. But in some crucial ways, it's a better movie. Besides resolving the question of what made the HAL computer go bonkers, it demonstrates how human succeed when they help each other get over problems, not when they compete. There's a scene where an American astronaut and a Russian cosmonaut have to make a tricky spacewalk from one space-ship to another. The cosmonaut helps the astronaut through a panic attack on the transit, but when they reach their destination, it's the cosmonaut who panics and is reassured by the astronaut. They succeed in the mission because they make up for each other's weaknesses. Later in the film, while their countries are at war back on Earth, they disregard their instructions to separate, and instead work together to avert a crisis of their own.

There's another incident where their spacecraft is undergoing severe turbulence in a maneuver that may be fatal. As another American straps himself down, a Russian cosmonaut slips in, and they silently hug each other for security. When the crisis is over, they part company. I love that scene. It's what we apes do when we're in trouble and need comfort, and it's what we've been doing ever since we started throwing bones into the air.

On another note, I watched David Lynch's Dune and found that it still held up over the years. Looking on IMDB, I learned that what we saw in the theaters was a butchery of the footage that he'd shot for the film. The studio ruthlessly cut several explanatory scenes in order to shorten the movie, which would have fared much better if they'd made it a two-parter like the most recent one. It's one of those films where we can only speculate on what might have been. Like Once Upon a Time in America, what began as a great movie (which still survives in DVD format) was turned into an incoherent theater release in the US. Roger Ebert tells the whole story here:

 
Inchresting trivia re: Once Upon a Time in America. I never knew that happened as I've only ever had access to the full version on video/streaming. Watching the shortened version today would probably drive me nuts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JLT
Just finished watching this super obscure movie, Turbo Kid (2015).

It takes place in an alternate, post-apoc 1997, so the soundtrack, cultural artifacts, colour scheme, etc. are all very mid to late 80s coded. Fun.

It doesn't take itself seriously but I still cared about the characters plenty. It's very darkly funny, has ridiculous, over the top ultra violence, but it also has a lot of heart. Such a fun time, and it's a tight 90 minutes.
 
Back
Top