Thinking about this a bit more, I like my personal hit/miss rate of what I enjoy reading is probably equivalent across genres. I feel there's the same ratio of bad to good regardless. But I'm more a style, language, and mechanics guy, I think, rather than content. And strangely enough, what they consider meaningful and thought-provoking I found MUCH more interesting when I was younger. I couldn't sit through a chapter of Faulkner now but I inhaled it when I was in my early 20s. I think it's a life style thing. Now that I have all the reality I can handle, the last thing I want to do in the recreation department is use my noodle.